War on Muslims: How to Destroy a Country and Get Off Scot-Free!
Posted on Wednesday, March 19 @ 07:11:37 EDT by qjaved
|
|
Anonymous writes "
Think about it for a moment...
 The warmongers invaded, crushed and occupied a country that was no threat to anyone.
They stood by as it was looted, exacerbated sectarianism, flattened entire towns, tortured untold numbers of innocents, brought in gum-chewing, tattooed foreign mercenaries and paid crony companies billions of dollars for mythical reconstruction projects.
The reason that the USA Government is able to get away with all of their lies is that we have a Department of Education that has succeeded in its job of dumbing down the masses. As long as everyone can have an ipod and see who the next "American Idol"is going to be, they are contented slaves.
But the day is coming in this country, and very soon I might add, when the masses of "Sheeple" will run around crying for someone to tell them the truth, tell them what happened. All along, it has been in front of their faces, and yet because it did not affect them right away, they did not care about their fellow man.
What happend in Iraq is but a test for what is planned by them for the people in America
Tuesday 18 March 2008 (10 Rabi` al-Awwal 1429)
How to Destroy a Country and Get Off Scot-Free
Linda Heard, sierra12th@yahoo.co.uk —
Someone once told me if you're going to tell a lie make it a whopper
based on the premise the more outrageous the lie the more likely it is
to be believed. At the time, I wrote off his advice as hogwash but as
we see from the Iraq debacle, he was right. Five years later, the
deceit continues undiminished and nobody has been held to account.
Britain's Gordon Brown yesterday promised to hold an enquiry into the
"mistakes" made in Iraq. Sounds good, but don't hold your breath. All
previous inquiries have been labeled "whitewashes". They can't afford
the truth to come out else they might get a one-way ticket to The Hague.
Ambassador David Satterfield, and adviser to Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, is doing the rounds of talk shows lauding America's
victories over Al-Qaeda in Iraq.
On one occasion the host interjected to mention the unpalatable fact
that Al-Qaeda members only flocked to Iraq once the Americans were in
place leaving Satterfield momentarily nonplussed.
It's obvious that Satterfield is so saturated in the party line he
forgot the Pentagon's recently published study that found with
certainty that Saddam Hussein had absolutely no links to Al-Qaeda. And
lest we forget Saddam didn't have WMD either, which means not only was
the war immoral the prewar sanctions on that country that contributed
to the deaths of over half-a-million Iraqi children were too.
Think about it for a moment. The warmongers invaded, crushed and
occupied a country that was no threat to anyone. They stood by as it
was looted, exacerbated sectarianism, flattened entire towns, tortured
untold numbers of innocents, brought in gum-chewing, tattooed foreign
mercenaries and paid crony companies billions of dollars for mythical
reconstruction projects.
They then pretended to hand over sovereignty to that country while at
the same time constructing permanent bases and the biggest US Embassy
in history resembling a small town. They said they had no interest in
Iraq's oil, yet they are putting immense pressure on the Iraqi
government (sic) to sign into law a bill that permits foreign (read
American) oil companies to lock up decades-long deals. Let's be frank.
Iraq wasn't a blunder, it was a crime. So how did they manage to get
away with implanting their long-conceived plot to do away with Israel's
No. 1 foe, ensure their competitors couldn't get their hands on Iraq's
resources and entrench their military might in the region? Future
historians will no doubt be scratching their heads over this one. You
had to live through it to believe it.
First, they cleverly used the politics of fear to sway public opinion.
As noted in the Project for the New American Century's document
"Rebuilding America's Defenses", the warmonger signatories - who later
became senior members of the Bush administration - needed "a new Pearl
Harbor". On Sept. 1l 2001 they got it. Americans and their allies were
in shock. Almost every country in the world was sympathetic and willing
to do anything to help. And, boy, did they capitalize on that empathy
even managing to persuade Russia to stay silent as they made deals with
Caspian states to allow US bases.
Step one was a country where a giant bogeyman was supposed to be hiding
out in a cave presumably equipped with a dialysis machine and a
production studio and whose black-turbaned government forced women to
wear a burqa and disallowed nail polish. But then Defense Minister
Donald Rumsfeld was disappointed because there weren't enough targets
for his bombs. It was no fun bombing a country into the Stone Age when
it was already there.
Step two was the insidious demonizing of Muslims, thousands of whom
were arrested and held for months without charge or access to lawyers.
In that climate of fear, it was relatively simple to persuade the
American people that Saddam Hussein was conniving with the people who
brought down the World Trade Center. US officials warned of mushroom
clouds; Prime Minister Tony Blair said British interests could be
attacked within 45 minutes of Saddam giving the order. Then Secretary
of State Colin Powell allowed himself to be used as their fall guy. He
spouted the most unbelievable scripted codswallop the UN had ever
heard...yet, bullied and bribed nation after nation pretended to
believe him as IAEA chief Mohammed El-Baradei and UN weapons inspector
Hans Blix did little to discredit the hoax.
Step three entailed replacing Osama in people's minds with Saddam, who
overnight morphed into a hydra-headed monster whose idea of a pleasant
weekend was gassing and torturing his own people.
Step four was 'Shock and Awe' which illuminated the Baghdad skyline on
March 19, 2003. As their bombs and missiles rained down on crowded
market places scattering limbs, they told us those bombs and missiles
were Saddam's even though the Independent's Middle East correspondent
inconveniently dug up their Made in the USA shards.
As the months went on, we began to wonder what happened to the WMD.
They told us it was only a matter of time before it would be unearthed
from under the sands or discovered in a tunnel under one of Saddam's
palaces. They even suggested it may have been shipped off to a
neighboring country for safekeeping!!
Step five was an orchestrated administration campaign to inject us with
mass amnesia. Never mind about the weapons, they said. We are here to
liberate the poor Iraqi people from their evil dictator and deliver
freedom and democracy. Look, look, they said. The Iraqis have purple
fingers! With up to one million dead, Iraqis are lucky they have any
fingers at all.
To be fair, they couldn't have done it without the aid of a compliant,
supine media, which embedded its reporters with US battalions and
agreed not to show captured US soldiers, flag-draped coffins, military
funerals or scenes of blood-soaked Iraqi civilians. Independent
reporters who neglected to abide by the script were discredited,
refused access to information and even shelled.
I still recall a live report from David Chater of Sky News, who saw the
barrel of a US tank slowly turn toward the Palestine hotel - known to
be a journalist's hang-out - before firing its shell killing three
reporters. The Baghdad offices of Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya were also
hit.
With so much information on tap I'm flabbergasted that so many people
still believe the Iraq fairytale. I wish they'd get in touch with me.
I've got a few pyramids and a sphinx going cheap. Sad, isn't it!
"
|
| |
|
